In what industry analysts view as the first major salvo in what could be a series of post-Durbin fee shakeups, merchant acquirers should learn soon the details of Visa Inc.’s new fixed acquirer network-participation fee.

The next step for acquirers, which would pass along the cost to their merchant clients, would be to explain what they get for the added expense.

During an earnings conference call with analysts last week, Joe Saunders, Visa chairman and CEO, indicated the card brand would “officially put out the specifications” to acquirers for the network-participation fee “in the next week.”

Visa has stated since July its intention to establish a network-participation fee and lower its variable fee, which is based on transaction volume (see story).  Under the variable fee, acquirers and merchants pay a sum for each card transaction that fluctuates depending on the number of transactions processed each month.

Visa views the network fee as a way to avoid competition over variable fees in light of requirements under the Durbin amendment to the Dodd-Frank law requiring issuers to support two unaffiliated networks for routing their debit transactions. The new Federal Reserve Board rule takes effect April 1.

Visa prefers not to compete on price with its variable rate for fear it could lose some routing business, Gil Luria, analyst with Los Angeles-based Wedbush Securities, tells PaymentsSource.

“If they establish a network-participation fee, and lower their variable fee, they will always have a lower variable than the competition,” Luria says, reasoning that no other network has come forward about a network participation fee and would not be in a position to lower variable fees to match Visa.

The key factor for merchant acquirers will be whether the new participation fee and the lower variable fees ultimately add up to savings for the merchants, Luria says. “The conversation with merchants takes on a very different feel, depending on if this is going to represent an overall increase,” he contends.

Visa originally said in July the network-participation fee would not represent an overall increase, Luria notes. But Visa executives were far less forthcoming about making the same declaration during last week’s earnings call.

A Visa spokesperson said the company could not comment about the network-participation fee, instead referred to comments Saunders made during the earnings call.

During that discussion, Saunders suggested the new fixed fee will “offer merchants greater incentive to route transactions over our network in an opportunity to lower their per-unit transactions costs.”

In addition, Saunders mentioned the new fee “is not a price increase, as we speak today, as it relates to the PIN capability on the signature card.”

Luria and other analysts say Saunders’ statement is too vague to fully determine how the new fee setup, which applies to all Visa credit and debit cards, will affect merchants’ bottom lines.

“We are only being told what we need to know at this point because the merchant acquirers will be the first to learn how it will be implemented,” Luria says.

Some industry disruption seems certain because some merchants with cash-flow problems are not going to like a network-participation fee that must be paid up front, Luria notes. “Those merchants will shoot the messenger in some cases and look to change merchant acquirers,” he says.

MasterCard Worldwide has not announced any new fee strategies, suggesting it is taking a “wait-and-see” approach to determine first how merchants react to Visa’s strategy, Luria says. MasterCard representatives were not available for comment.

That Visa has formulated a new fee strategy is not surprising, considering the Federal Reserve Board also established new, considerably lower debit-interchange fees under another mandate from the Durbin amendment, Brian Riley, senior research director and analyst with Needham, Mass.-based TowerGroup, tells PaymentsSource.

“Dodd-Frank upset the apple cart by messing around with pricing, so now every nook and cranny will be looked at for possible fees,” Riley contends.

Operating on the premise that the merchant has to pay something because access to a card brand network “is not a free service,” the networks are likely to continue tweaking fees, Riley says.

Acquiring consultant Paul Martaus of Mountain Home, Ark.-based Martaus & Associates suggests the networks may want to be cautious about future fees and how they present them.

“There is so much potential for backlash from merchants out there,” Martaus contends. “What if someone like Pay Pal Inc. or Facebook creates a competing product?”

If a merchant gets disenchanted with network fees, it is not out of the realm of possibility that the merchant could opt to establish payments with “virtual currency” through a Facebook business page, Martaus says.

“A PayPal or Facebook prepaid card could also become options in the future,” Martaus says. “We’re going through some astonishing changes, so nothing would be surprising.”

In a research report to its investors Feb. 9, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC stated its belief that Visa was on solid earnings grounds with its post-Durbin strategy.

Establishing the new fee schedule in hopes it could increase business potentially allows Visa to limit any downside from the looming April 1 routing mandate, the report stated.

What do you think about this? Send us your feedback. Click Here.

Subscribe Now

Authoritative analysis and perspective for every segment of the payments industry

14-Day Free Trial

Authoritative analysis and perspective for every segment of the industry