Why checks won't go away in B-to-B payments
For all of the noise in the payments industry around transitioning to real-time and same-day digital payments — and in the mainstream media around the bitcoin craze — paper checks still persist as the preferred means of disbursement for the majority of business-to-business transactions.

This is an inconvenient truth for an industry that is obsessed with speed and technological solutions and testament to the fact that in payments, old habits die hard. This is especially true in the U.S., where businesses have come to rely on the float and familiarity that checks provide.
Chart: The B-to-B cash flow problem
Delays in B-to-B payments are truly an international problem, but some regions are worse than others.

According to research conducted by Atradius, the Americas present the greatest lag time in payments, with 12% of domestic and 16% of foreign payments being more than 90 days late. Asia Pacific businesses on average experience 9% of domestic payments and 11% of foreign payments being more than 90 days late. The lowest levels of late payments occurred in the European region, where on average domestic payments saw higher rates of late payments than foreign payments.

There are a number of reasons for this — Europe, while a patchwork of countries, has a high degree of interoperability between nations because of participation in the European Union and the numerous directives designed to facilitate cross-border payment standards. There are also a number of countries that have deployed their own real-time payments networks, including Faster Payments in the U.K., Nets Realtime 24/7 in Denmark and Swiss Interbank Clearing in Switzerland. These developments have meant that real alternatives to funds disbursement via paper check have had an impact on the speed of settlement.
Chart: B-to-B check volume creeps up
Somewhat paradoxically, B-to-B payments made by check have actually gone up in the U.S. since 2013. According to a survey conducted by the Association of Financial Professionals, a majority (51%) of organizations’ B-to-B payments continue to be made by check. Although the use of checks in B-to-B payments had been steadily declining since 2004, there has been a one-percentage-point increase in check usage since 2013.

Given the availability of electronic payments alternatives—especially when compared to payment practices in other industrialized countries where checks are rarely used—there seems to be a particular reluctance by U.S.-based businesses to fully transition away from check payments. However, this is still significantly less than the 81% and 74% reported in 2004 and 2007, respectively, and can be expected to be something of a blip on an otherwise downward trajectory for B-to-B check volume as electronic alternatives become increasingly pervasive.
Chart: PSD2's shadow over banks
For U.S. FIs, it will be necessary to keep an eye on developments in electronic payment standards overseas to ensure parity and that U.S. institutions remain competitive.

The Payment Services Directive (PSD2) is due to go into effect in Europe in 2018. While not directly targeting U.S. institutions, it sets a new standard for data sharing between banks and third parties such as mobile payment startups, personal financial management and budgeting apps and other mostly-digital companies that provide specialized financial services. There are also requirements to toughen security to protect from payment fraud and breaches, and the phasing out of screen scraping (an older method of aggregating data) in favor of application programming interfaces.

According to PwC, 94% of European banks are currently working on PSD2 compliance. Much of this may be to retain relevance in the wake of third-party competition, since 68% of banks fear loss of data control and 66% of banks will have to change strategic positioning because of PSD2. PwC also found that 88% of consumers were using third-party payments, which may be further motivation to remain relevant.
Chart: Making B-to-B faster is a priority
U.S. institutions are, however, taking significant steps to update B-to-B payment platforms.

In an American Bankers Association survey of 219 U.S. financial institutions conducted in March 2017, the highest priorities for commercial bank investment were in ACH, wire transfers and check electronification technologies such as remote deposit capture (RDC). Eighty-four percent of commercial institutions considered ACH to be a high or very high investment priority, closely followed by 71% of institutions considering wire transfers to be a high or very high investment priority.

By contrast, paper checks were seen as a high or very high investment priority by just 15% of U.S. commercial institutions.
Chart: Businesses plan to electronify B-to-B
It’s not only FIs that are investing in technologies to aid in the conversion of B-to-B transactions from paper checks to electronic alternatives. According to the AFP, 44% of U.S. businesses are very likely and 26% are somewhat likely to convert B-to-B payments from paper check to digital over the next three years. Just 8% stated that converting to electronic alternatives to paper check was not at all likely.